Kirsten Potter and Amy Danneker in A View from the Bridge (Alabastro Photography) |
A View from the Bridge
Seattle Repertory Theatre
Through October 18,
2015
Director Braden
Abraham’s notes about his mounting of Arthur Miller’s A View from the Bridge reference the timeliness of the play because
of Syrian refugees and the issue of immigration. In that, I disagree
with him. The play does revolve around a couple of Sicilian illegal immigrants
coming into Eddie Carbone’s family. But immigration issues really only point to
the power and privilege that Eddie wields over them.
Arthur Miller’s play is not important because of current
events. The play is important because of its reflection of privilege and
obsession and the power of self-destruction, and rooted in history. It is far
more poetic than most plays, with a narrator lawyer (Leonard Kelly-Young) who tells us ahead of the coming tragedy that
he can see it coming and cannot stop it. In fact, he does everything he can to
advise Eddie (Mark Zeisler) to right
his own ship before it sinks.
Miller took a small man, an ordinary family, and elevated
them to great drama. This meme was where great American writing took dramatic
storytelling, where most often plays had been about royalty and the wealthy.
Miller was of the budding tradition of Clifford Odets, Tennessee Williams,
Eugene O’Neill. They used the nuclear family to substitute for grand ideas and
great drama. Poverty was acceptable as an economic theatrical display.
A View from the Bridge
is not easy to watch from a 2015 perspective. Eddie Carbone is a small-minded Italian-American
longshoreman and relishes his position as head of his family, with his wife,
Beatrice (Kirsten Potter), and
niece, Catherine (Amy Danneker),
whom he has raised from a small girl. The aesthetic of the day (the play
appears to be set in the 1940s) is that men have an unquestioned right to dictate
their opinions to the females of the family.
It’s also an age of little real conversation with a lot
unsaid. There are code words. Beatrice’s relatives arrive from Europe to be
hidden away from immigration officials. Marco (Brandon O’Neill) is a hard-working family man whose family is
starving. Rudolpho (Frank Boyd) is single
and carefree, loves to sing, and make jokes. Eddie dislikes him practically on
sight, then feels like Rudolpho’s behavior points to him being gay. No one ever
says a real word about any of that. It’s all innuendo.
Eddie also has a strong, and to Beatrice’s eye, unnatural
attachment to his niece. He tries to poison Catherine’s attraction to
Rudolpho. His lack of ability to rule his world takes its toll on the whole
family.
Zeisler and Kelly-Young inhabit their roles strongly.
Zeisler is a robust man who looks like he strains to tamp down his energy and
imbues Eddie with an air of restrained violence. Potter and Danneker beguile in
their family role and feed off each other magnificently. O’Neill does well in a
role with few lines, but has the necessary physique for a strapping dock
worker. And Boyd brings the fresh air of abandon and enjoyment, exactly as
ordered.
Scott Bradley has given us a beautiful set with a
3-dimensional bridge and tenement background and a ground-floor apartment. Rose
Pedersen’s costumes reflect the period well and give the women flattering and
up-to-date looks of the time that still fit a modest-budget purse.
Abraham directs this piece strongly, keeping the pot
bubbling but not overboiling. However, there is a disconcerting choice to break
the living room wall space by having people walk through it, instead of in the
door. This mars an otherwise sophisticated effort, and shows Abraham’s growing
security in directing.
Overall, this play is worth experiencing on the stage,
rather than just on the page. The cast brings it to life beautifully. Then
afterward, you can go eat spaghetti and talk about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.