Anne Allgood and Pamela Reed in Luna Gale (Alan Alabastro) |
Luna Gale
Seattle Repertory Theatre
Through March 27, 2016
Playwright Rebecca Gilman is an “issues-oriented” writer.
She takes on hot-button, current, modern issues and writes plays about them.
Her ability to have her characters speak in real-people dialogue is terrific
and admirable. That is all on display with Seattle Rep’s mounting of Luna Gale, a Gilman play about the
foster-care system with all sides of the dilemma on stage.
There is much to appreciate in the staging. Pamela Reed, as Caroline – the
long-time social worker who has seen so much that her instincts kick in when
evidence doesn’t, is terrific in the role. Practical, worn down, but also
hiding a heart of gold, Reed’s character is able to fill in all kinds of
information about how the system works or doesn’t in state programs that have
seen all kinds of budget cutting over the last decade.
But a foster care story on stage needs a specific family and
here we meet Karlie (Hannah Mootz)
and her high school boyfriend Peter (Drew
Highlands) who have recently lost their daughter, Luna, by becoming meth
addicts! When Caroline looks to place the child with Karlie’s mother, Cindy (Anne Allgood), Karlie becomes very
upset and insists that her child would be better off with a random foster
family than with her mother.
The ostensible reason is that Cindy is very Christian and
Karlie says she’s afraid Cindy will want to inculcate Luna into dogmatic
Christianity. And Cindy is indeed very dogmatically Christian. Act One makes us
think that Caroline might be prejudiced against dogmatic, apocalyptic
Christianity, and it looks like she will hatch a scheme with Karlie and Peter
to help them get Luna back. Perhaps not all is quite as it seems.
But then add in Caroline’s nasty boss (Alex Matthews) who turns out to be friends with Cindy’s pastor Jay
(Adrian LaTourelle) and some office
politics enters in, as well. And for good measure, Caroline is potentially a
bit too invested in a young woman who has “graduated” from foster care and is
headed off to college, Lourdes (Pilar O’Connell).
Some of those elements put the plot into movie-of-the-week
territory, as some audience members muttered during intermission. We kind of
already can guess that Lourdes’ situation isn’t going to go that well, which is
too bad, because it would be less cliché to have Lourdes actually beat her
background, as some foster kids can and do.
Pastor Jay is quite a reasonable and fine character, here,
and rescues the Christianity part of the plot from pissing a lot of Christians
off at the play. Matthews’ role is not necessarily cliché, but the workplace
tension doesn’t add to the rest of the story being presented.
Part of Act Two adds in another element of sexual abuse that
probably credibly propels many young people, including possibly Karlie, toward
drug abuse. So, its inclusion can be seen as Gilman’s effort to give a 360
degree picture of the different aspects that come into play with drug abuse,
young parents, children who need to be removed from parents, and social workers
placing those children.
Audience members who have not been exposed to foster care
much, and maybe that includes a vast majority of Seattle Rep subscribers, will
gain a great deal of useful information about the plight of children in the
system, and also the plight of the overworked, stressed and undersupported
social workers who have to make these very personal and life-changing
evaluations about children and those who care for them.
Braden Abraham’s staging
is generally well presented, especially with very quick set changes that slide out
and miraculously change to slide back in, so location changes are virtually
instantaneous. Michael Ganio’s
design allows the play to keep moving quickly, which is crucial because sometimes
the scenes do bog down. Kevin O’Donnell’s
sound design is also an important scene change element that helps give the
audience an auditory respite.
The cast is strong, with some of my favorite actors. They
all bring as much reasonableness and earnestness of character as they can.
Because they are so watchable, the evening succeeds, but later on, in
reflection, I think there is a wish that Gilman might have restrained herself
from adding in all those elements. If the family drama stayed more focused on
the family, and deepened the conflicts, the whole play might pay off better.
Instead, it tends to fall apart when picked at just a little
bit. The impression of movie-of-the-week overtakes the drama and reduces the
play to more of a sermon than an immersion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.