Ellen McLaughlin and Teagle F. Bougere in Roz and Ray (Alan Alabastro) |
Roz and Ray
Seattle Repertory Theatre
Through November 13,2016
Karen Hartman is
a local playwright also gaining national recognition. Her newest play, Roz and Ray, is getting a co-world
premiere production between the Seattle Repertory Theatre and Victory Gardens
Theater in Chicago. The artistic director of Victory Gardens, Chay Yew, supplely directs this
production and two veteran actors with national theater credits take on the
roles in this roiling, emotional two-hander.
The unassuming title gives nothing away about what kind of
relationship Roz and Ray have. It is definitely unique, in that Roz is a hematologist
and Ray is a parent of twin hemophiliacs who need constant medical attention and
blood products to stay alive. The play jumps back and forward in time from the
late 1970s to 1991. This is key to the subject at hand.
We’re talking about AIDS. It’s a potent topic, not
significantly explored in plays, though not unknown for including Gay life and
AIDS’ affect on that culture, as many or most SGN readers can attest to. But
most of us don’t know and can stand some education about how AIDS affected
people who needed blood product to live normal lives.
We’re introduced to the doctor and patients when the twins
we never actually see are seven years old and are being taught how to
self-inject Factor H. We learn that this is a new (in the late ‘70s) kind of
blood product that revolutionizes how hemophiliacs can manage care, including
allowing them to inject at home, safely – they thought – and avoiding hospital
care and improving clotting to enjoy a very much more normal life.
But immediately after that, we jump to 1991 with Ray
shouting to the heavens that Roz killed his son! It’s a huge – and theatrically
gripping – moment. It immediately intrigues and takes the play out of any
normal relationship.
There is a great deal of fascinating dialogue and just
enough medical information to allow us to understand how AIDS reached into this
population’s medical care and destroyed faith in the blood donation national
treatment process. Hartman smartly doesn’t overwhelm here.
The two actors, Ellen
McLaughlin and Teagle F. Bougere,
are nationally known stars who have both been on the Rep stage from time to
time, to our delight. They are of the caliber of actor who could read the phone
book and keep an audience interested.
Bougere has the more engaging character, here, with more
emotional levels and more humor. McLaughlin’s character has much less humor and
more personality confusion, in terms of how to interact with a man she comes to
care for while keeping professional boundaries. They have an awkward chemistry,
which makes sense in context.
In this iteration of the script, there is an unfortunate
subplot. Plays often go through a lot of collaborative feedback and suggestions
from other playwrights, directors, and theater friends, and sometimes things
might creep into a play that derail it from its full potential. It is
impossible, without a conversation with Hartman, to determine how or why a
romance got inserted into this play. Maybe it was Hartman’s idea from the
start.
However, the topic and the relationship of desperate need
between a doctor and a parent of medically fragile children is fraught enough
to be fascinating fodder for the play. The interdependence might indeed cause
them to be tricked into the idea that they might be romantically interested and
psychology has much to say on that topic. But at present, the romance derails
the whole play into more of a soap opera and a jilted lover-type scenario than
a real medical tragedy.
In fact, there might be an easy fix, since the script is so
very solid in every other way. Take out the actual romance (even if one leaves
in the moment when they make a mistaken physical connection) and remove the
uninspired mawkish ending and you have a play that will demand being produced
everywhere in the English-speaking world. It’s potential is that good.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.