David Pichette and Rob Burgess in Camping with Henry and Tom (Erik Stuhaug) |
Camping With Henry and
Tom
Taproot Theatre
Through March 3, 2018
Mark St. Germain’s specialty is writing plays about real
events and bringing them to life through infusing his imagination into how
these events might have come about. Taproot Theatre really likes his stuff and
has done three previous plays of his (the vital Best of Enemies, Freud’s Last
Session and Relativity) before
the current production of Camping With
Henry and Tom.
St. Germain is adept at inventing realistic dialogue with
historical figures and even when his plays don’t quite work all the way
through, they are generally not boring. Camping
is not one of his best plays. It, too, is not exactly boring, especially with
the terrific actors employed by Taproot as Thomas Edison (Rob Burgess), Henry Ford (David
Pichette) and President Warren Harding (Frank Lawler). Scott Nolte’s
usual deft direction brings out the best in these actors as they take on these
semi-well-known people.
It’s clear why Nolte chose to do the play. Written in the
mid-1990s, Camping animated St.
Germain after the presidential candidacy of businessman Ross Perot, and the
idea that a businessman could run this country “better than any politician.” …
Hmm… Where have we heard that, lately? Well, we almost had a similar situation
back in 1923, when Henry Ford contemplated his own run at the presidency.
St. Germain discovered that Henry Ford and others took
annual camping trips together and Thomas Edison was part of them until after
one year, he never went camping again. So, what could have happened? St.
Germain imagines these three highly placed individuals getting into a car wreck
in the woods without any security and having to deal with that awkward
situation.
There is smart dialogue about corporations and government
and what each might do better than the other. However, St. Germain gives a lot
of very lofty and eloquent dialogue about “giving back to the People” to Henry
Ford, who helped to perfect the assembly line, which is why he got rich. But
Ford was a known anti-Semite, in fact virulent about it. In fact, each of these
men has been revealed in history to have major humanitarian flaws.
St. Germain does allow Ford’s antipathies to come out in the
second act more than the first, but by withholding that dynamic and other
controversies until Act Two, Act One is a bit too sedate and long. Too little
happens, and there is no real danger, even though they are lost in the woods,
may not be found for potentially days, and have few resources to protect them
from the elements.
Each of the three main actors (eventually Kevin Pitman shows up as the Secret
Service guy who gets them back home) finds special and unique mannerisms to
deliver their characters. While Edison is not a joke, here he is often given a
punchline, and Burgess uses full-bodied hand motions as a character
development. Lawler subtly weaves pathos and weakness into Harding, a president
most consider one of our worst ever. Pichette strongly performs the vitriolic
and cunning Ford with forthrightness and a lot of swearing.
To the extent that an audience watching a play is expected
to identify with and like the characters on stage, these particular individuals
are problematic in that way. Because of the actors and the off-and-on comedic dialogue,
it’s as if we are supposed to like or at least agree that Ford and Edison, who
stole a lot of patents and buried a lot of other people’s inventions, and
Harding are worth spending this time with in order to say “important things.”
But frankly, while there are plenty of important things to
discuss about corporations and government, this particular trio does not bring
many of them to the surface, nor delve deeply enough into them to make for an
interesting exploration.
Mostly, this play makes us sigh in relief that Ford never
became president. It makes us long for another guy’s lack of success, and
unintentionally inspires us to think that no businessperson should ever again
attempt to run for that office. We don’t really know what a good
businessperson, who also understands what government is good at, might really
do for this country.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.