Marianne Owen and Kurt Beattie in The Gin Game (Tracy Martin) |
The Gin Game
Village Theatre
Issaquah: through February 25, 2018
Everett: March 2-25, 2018
A two-hander (two people) about a couple of older people in
an old-folks home, The Gin Game opened
in 1976 with the classic theatrical couple Hume Cronin and Jessica Tandy. I’ll
bet these two were great to watch on stage. Now, Village Theatre has pulled off
a similar feat by casting Kurt Beattie
and Marianne Owen, the classic
Seattle theatrical couple, in their production.
Directed by another Seattle treasure, Jeff Steitzer, the production is probably as good as you can
imagine a production should be. Beattie and Owen hit all the right emotional
notes as the two relatively new home inhabitants get to know each other and don’t
much else to do but play gin.
Weller (Beattie) thinks of himself as a great gin player. As
he invites Fonsia (Owen) to play, he seems happy to mentor her, and clearly
does not think she’ll mount much of a challenge. Fonsia does tell him she has
“a bit” of experience with gin rummy, but he discounts that as they begin.
Instead of being an easy mark, Fonsia begins to win an
incredible streak and Weller’s competitive nature starts to cause him to erupt
with unseemly rage. Fonsia tries to stop playing, but Weller literally grabs
her and doesn’t allow her to leave. No matter what she wants, the game must go
on.
The play doesn’t hold up as well, now, as when it won its
Pulitzer Prize in 1978. It might have been a fresh idea in 1976 to create a
play about older people. Truly, even now, there are not many plays that
actively reflect that time of life, even as the theater-going population skews
older and older. If companies are supposed to “play to their audiences,” you’d
think that a bunch of playwriting would be focused on older people’s troubles.
That doesn’t seem to be the programming path.
Fonsia tries to stick up for herself and the play may now be
a good example of what we mean when we say that people need to learn about
“consent.” Weller’s anger also scares Fonsia and she doesn’t know what to
expect. Indeed, a lot of times, when women do things that men get angry about,
men can and do become violent and scary. If it starts a conversation about that
kind of interaction, that would be a good thing.
One way the production could choose to be stronger is to
eliminate the intermission. The play turns out to be a fairly short one in “run
time” – the amount of time it takes to stage the whole thing. Here,
intermission is 45 minutes in. The first two scenes are so tame as to be kind
of boring, almost. The bang is in the second act, also two scenes. If you’re
not engaged by intermission, you’d have a tendency to leave and miss the
fireworks.
If it were possible to choose to eliminate that
intermission, the play would immediately move into the third (of four) scenes
and wake the audience up. There is both more movement (the couple dances) and
more energy then. If you choose to see the play, make sure to stay for the
payoff, the second act.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.