Andrew Lee Creech and Spencer Hamp in Buzzer (Michelle Bates) |
Buzzer
AJ Epstein Productions at ACT Theatre
Through February 21, 2016
A lot could be said about gentrification. There are all
kinds of sides to look at: the people who live in a blighted area because they
must (no income options, red-lining, etc.); the people who move there early to
take advantage of lower costs in anticipation of the boom; the people who move
there after most or all the dangerous elements have been displaced. Plays have
examined this, somewhat, like Clybourn
Park.
Since so often gentrification has happened to areas that
start with poor black residents and become majority white, there are powerful
stories to be told in play format. Tracey Scott Wilson has written one that
defies easy categorization as commentary on gentrification, Buzzer, now onstage at ACT Theatre,
co-produced with AJ Epstein Productions. She includes an uncommon trio, and in
this production, the trio on stage feel uneasily linked. So, should the play be
seen as commentary on gentrification?
We meet Jackson (Andrew
Lee Creech), who is a successful, black lawyer who has purchased a condo in
his old, dangerous neighborhood, where gentrification is already in full swing.
Cafes and upscale restaurants have begun moving in, but much of the blight
still remains. Young black men hang around in small groups, surly about those
moving into the neighborhood who would not have wanted to live there before.
Jackson wants to make a home for long-time love, Suzy (Chelsea LeValley), a white schoolteacher
who is unsure of her safety, but wants to commit to Jackson. A plot about the
two of them could involve just this one choice of property with plenty of
substance. But Wilson includes a best friend of Jackson, Don (Spencer Hamp), who is a recovering
addict, and also white, and also was
raised with a golden spoon in his mouth.
The title comes from the broken buzzer that sounds when
people push the button but the condo-dwellers can’t respond to them. They’ve
got to go to the door (“downstairs”). It’s a subtle commentary on the upscale
building with broken amenities. Similar to a neighborhood that is renovated but
not yet ready for use.
There seem to be too many plot insertions: Jackson worked
hard to go to top law schools, Don was born in a rich family and became the
family dropout. Jackson lived in the neighborhood, but spent much time staying
indoors to avoid the dangers, Don lived on the street in that same
neighborhood, getting to know it in ways Jackson may not have. Don is in
recovery but in danger of using again for the 9th time after a
rehab. Suzy has become sick of Don’s failings and doesn’t want him to live with
the couple.
There are black/white issues, money issues, trust issues,
neighborhood issues. The play is packed!
Creech, here, fails to convince in his role, and is the most
“act-y” I have ever seen him. He seems to be convincing himself that he can
play a successful lawyer, and that translates to the audience not believing
him. His chemistry with LeValley is uneven.
LeValley does a nice job in the role of Suzy and Hamp is a
smashing addict, maybe because the writing of his character is the most
interesting.
Wilson is a playwright to know and it’s very clear why the
play would be chosen. It’s difficult to know whether it is production issues
that make it less compelling or writing issues. I “wanted” it to be great, from
hearing about it. For me, this just didn’t quite stack up to what it seems to
aspire to.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is a moderated comment section. Any comment can be deleted if the moderator feels that basic civility standards are not being met. Disagreements, however, if respectfully stated, are certainly welcome. Just keep the discussion intelligent and relatively kind.